Sample reports.
Anonymized from real reports. Names, locations and exact figures are changed. Every figure here is a sample, not a quote.
Sample reports – illustrative
Weekly reportLab resultsRecommendationPlan and budgetSeason review
Weekly scouting report.
What we saw in each block, what we’re watching and what happens next. One of these ends every visit.
- Leaves
- FAIR lesion / spotdiscoloration
- Shoots
- GOOD
- Trunk / scaffold
- GOOD
- Present
- Yes
- Severity
- LIGHT
- Distribution
- patchy
- Top species
- pigweed
- Height
- 14”
| Pest | Severity |
|---|---|
| Vertebrates | LIGHT |
| Spider mites 18% of leaves, no predators seen | LIGHT |
| 7 others – none observed in the block (navel orangeworm is tracked by trap, below) | |
| Disease | Severity |
|---|---|
| Rust | MODERATE |
| Alternaria | MODERATE |
| Red leaf blotch | SEVERE |
| 6 others – none observed (scab, shot hole, hull rot, bacterial spot, anthracnose, brown rot) | |
- Tissue Jul 17
- Results in hand
- Hull split spray #3
- Aug 4 To do
- Foliar spray at hull split
- Second navel orangeworm spray, 2-3 week follow-up
Lab results, flagged.
Every number marked low, OK or high against the target for your crop and timing, then read against the other tests before anything is recommended.
Leaf tissue analysis
Sample Ranch – Block 7 · Almonds · 35 ac
| Analyte | Result | Target (July) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen (N) | 2.1 % | 2.4–2.7 | Low |
| Phosphorus (P) | 0.22 % | 0.20–0.30 | OK |
| Potassium (K) | 2.5 % | 2.2–2.6 | OK |
| Calcium (Ca) | 3.8 % | 3.0–4.0 | OK |
| Magnesium (Mg) | 0.70 % | 0.40–0.80 | OK |
| Sulfur (S) | 0.13 % | 0.15–0.35 | Low |
| Sodium (Na) | 0.02 % | ≤ 0.10 | OK |
| Chloride (Cl) | 0.27 % | ≤ 0.25 | High |
| Boron (B) | 52 ppm | 35–80 | OK |
| Zinc (Zn) | 20 ppm | 30–70 | Low |
| Manganese (Mn) | 39 ppm | 50–180 | Low |
| Iron (Fe) | 104 ppm | 70–150 | OK |
| Copper (Cu) | 8.6 ppm | 8–20 | OK |
Soil analysis
Sample Ranch – Block 7 · Almonds · 35 ac
| Cation | Actual | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium | 67.6 % | 62.6 % | OK |
| Magnesium | 23.0 % | 14.7 % | Above targetHigh |
| Potassium | 5.8 % | ≥ 6 % | Below minLow |
| Sodium | 3.6 % | ≤ 1.5 % | ExcessHigh |
| Nutrient | Found | Ideal | Gap | Found vs ideal | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium (Ca) | 980 | 1,500 | +520 | DeficientLow | |
| Magnesium (Mg) | 200 | 200 | 0 | OK | |
| Potassium (K) | 165 | 200 | +35 | DeficientLow | |
| Sodium (Na) | 60 | 25 max | −35 | ExcessHigh | |
| Phosphorus (P) | 95 | 200 | +105 | DeficientLow | |
| Sulfur (S) | 40 | 100 | +60 | DeficientLow | |
| Boron (B) | 0.5 | 2.0 | +1.5 | DeficientLow | |
| Iron (Fe) | 200 | 100 | −100 | ExcessHigh | |
| Manganese (Mn) | 90 | 50 | −40 | ExcessHigh | |
| Zinc (Zn) | 8.4 | 20.0 | +11.6 | DeficientLow | |
| Copper (Cu) | 13 | 10 | −3 | ExcessHigh |
Recommendation, with the cost per acre.
The why, the rate, the timing and the cost per acre, before anything is ordered.
Sample Ranch – Block 7 · Almonds · 35 ac · Based on leaf tissue (Jul 17) and soil analysis (Aug 22)
| What | The why | Rate | Timing | Cost per acre |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potassium sulfateSoil, dry | Soil potassium is at 83% of ideal and sulfur at 40%. This one product supplies both. | 200 lb/ac | After harvest, banded in the herbicide strip | $72.5 |
| Zinc sulfateSoil, dry | Soil zinc is at 42% of ideal, and leaf zinc is 20 ppm against a 30–70 target. | 35 lb/ac | After harvest, same trip as the potassium | $26.5 |
| Manganese sulfateFoliar | Leaf manganese is 39 ppm against a 50–180 target. | 5 lb/ac | With the next foliar pass | $3.0 |
| Dry spreadingApplication | One trip covers the potassium and the zinc. | 1 pass | Same trip | $8.0 |
| Total per acre. Block 7 (35 ac): $3,850 | $110.0 | |||
- Nitrogen is low in the leaf (2.1% against 2.4–2.7%). It’s handled in the spring liquid program in the plan.
- Phosphorus and boron read low in the soil but sit in range in the leaf, so nothing goes on this fall. We recheck with the next tissue sample.
- Calcium is low in pounds but on target as a share of the soil’s exchange capacity, so no amendment.
- Sodium and chloride run high. We watch them through the irrigation water results rather than add anything.
Plan and budget.
The season laid out before you spend, then updated as it changes.
Sample Ranch – Block 7 · Almonds · 35 ac
| Stage | Planned work | Per acre |
|---|---|---|
| Post-harvest November | Fall nutrition, per the recommendation | $110.0 |
| Dormant December | Preemergent herbicide pass | $63.5 |
| Pink bud February | Foliar nutrition at delayed dormancy | $33.5 |
| Bloom March | Bloom fungicide with foliar nutrients | $47.5 |
| Spring March–April | Liquid fertility program | $96.5 |
| Spring May | Spring protection spray | $50.5 |
| Early summer June | Weed control and ant bait | $48.0 |
| Hull split July–August | Three timed hull-split sprays and a summer weed pass | $160.5 |
| Total per acre. Block 7 (35 ac): $21,350 | $610.0 | |
Season review.
What we did, what it cost and what we’d change, block by block.
Sample Ranch – what we did, what it cost and what we’d change, block by block
What we did. Preemergent, pink bud foliar, bloom fungicide, a spring liquid fertility pass, a spring protection spray, two weed passes, ant bait and three hull-split sprays.
What we’d change. Leaf nitrogen, zinc and manganese ran low in July. Move the first nitrogen pass up two weeks and add zinc and manganese to the bloom foliar. Keep the fungicide at the first hull-split spray, where alternaria was already moderate.
What we did. Preemergent in the herbicide strip, early bloom and full-bloom sprays, a spring plant bug and mummy-nut foliar, two weed passes, ant bait and two hull-split sprays.
What we’d change. The spring insect pass was the biggest single cost. Count mummy nuts in winter so that pass is sized to the actual load.
What we did. Pink bud foliar, spring protection, four monthly liquid fertility passes, weed control, ant bait and two hull-split sprays.
What we’d change. Liquid fertility was the largest line on the ranch. Tie each month’s rate to the latest leaf result instead of running a flat schedule.
Walk a field with us.
We come out to your ground and see what’s going on. Maybe we pull a sample, maybe we go through last season’s records. Then you get a proposal in writing. No obligation.
Got it, thanks.
Here’s what happens next:
- A person reads it. Not a bot, not a sales queue.
- We price it, shopping it across suppliers.
- We reach out the way you told us.
We will get back to you. Have the rec in an email? Send it to hello@syndicate.ag.
Need us sooner? Call 209-899-1612A person on our team will read what you sent.
If it looks like a fit for our growers, we will be in touch. Thank you for reaching out.
Here’s what happens next:
- A person reads it. Not a bot, not a sales queue.
- We reach out the way you told us, around the time you prefer.
- We set a time to walk your ground, or send what you asked for. No obligation.
We will get back to you. If you have last season’s records handy, bring them.
Need us sooner? Call 209-899-1612Got it, thanks.
Here’s what happens next:
- A person reads it. Not a bot, not a sales queue.
- We reach out the way you told us, around the time you prefer.
- We set a time to walk your ground, or send what you asked for. No obligation.
We will get back to you. If you have last season’s records handy, bring them.
Need us sooner? Call 209-899-1612